Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.
Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.
Object type: Pair of round-shafts in double base
Measurements:
Stone 1a: H. 115 cm; W. 50 > 39 cm; D. 48 > 38 cm
Stone 1b: H. 90 cm; W. 55 > 42 cm; D. 52 > 39 cm
Stone type: A coarse-grained brown sandstone, probably Millstone Grit
Plate numbers in printed volume: Ills. 226–9
Corpus volume reference: Vol 13 p. 192
(There may be more views or larger images available for this item. Click on the thumbnail image to view.)
The two shafts are presently set in a double-socket base stone and so are treated as one monument. Both shafts are undecorated tapering cylinders, and as such have no distinguishable faces. One shaft is shorter and generally broader than the other, but the dimensions suggest that they were not originally part of a single column. The shorter shaft is damaged by a wide slot suggesting former use, perhaps as a gate-post.
The shafts, sometimes known as ‘Robin Hoods Picking Rods’, have also been referred to as ‘The Maiden Stones’ (Cox 1904, 57). There is no evidence to show that they are Anglo-Saxon in origin except that they are tapering round shafts consistent with other examples in the region which do bear diagnostic details. There is thus every possibility that these two shafts were once round-shafted crosses found in many areas of England. Indeed, the taller of the two has a distinct taper, consistent with round-shafted crosses of the region, which as noted in Chapter III, cluster around the border area between north-western Derbyshire, north-eastern Staffordshire and south-eastern Cheshire (Sidebottom 1994, distribution map 9). As with these other examples it is possible that these shafts are reused Roman milestones. Notable is the proximity of the former Roman road from Buxton. The twin-socketed base stone is also consistent with examples found in an Anglo-Saxon context, especially in the neighbouring county of Cheshire (see e.g. Disley 3; Bailey 2010, 79–80), although when these shafts were set into this base is uncertain. The taller shaft is a reasonably good fit for its socket, but the taller is too thin.



