Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.
Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.
Object type: Grave-cover, in two joining pieces [1]
Measurements: L. 171.5 cm (67.5 in); W. 53 > 52.5 cm (20.8 > 20.5 in); D. 16 cm (6.25 in)
Stone type: See no. 7.
Plate numbers in printed volume: 563-567
Corpus volume reference: Vol 3 p. 162-163
(There may be more views or larger images available for this item. Click on the thumbnail image to view.)
A (top): The perimeter has a broad border which, along the long sides, has a meander pattern, changing to chevrons at one end; the other end was apparently plain. In one corner is an incised diagonal turned into a cross with expanded terminals. Within the panel is a mat of interlace of encircled patterns. The design is irregular and contains several free rings, or circles broken at only one point, in conjunction with long diagonals. The pattern is essentially a twelve-cord mirror image one, with pattern F and linked pattern C elements (Adcock 1974, I, 247–8). At the base there is an arc of pellet fillers. At the top the interlace terminates in ring-knots with return loops, and a four-petalled motif within one segment of the circle. In certain places the logic of the interlace is bungled.
B, D and E (long sides and end): Along the narrow side is a row of triangular 'tassels' which taper and terminate in a pellet. At the base is a broad, flat moulding.
C (end): Plain.
The tasselled edge suggests, as Collingwood perceived, a skeuomorph of a pall, and, when painted, the appearance would have been yet more convincing. It hints at the nature of ninth-century embroidery in Deira. It has been compared with a cross-base at Lindisfarne, Northumberland (no. 19; Cramp 1984, I, 201, II, pl. 196, 1103), which also resembles a cloth covering. The interlace does have some minor foliate features but has the rigidly geometrical appearance of later work. Adcock regards the design as experimental, and cites parallel constructions in the Durham Cassiodorus (Durham Cathedral, MS B II 30), the Leningrad Gospels (Leningrad, Public Library Cod. F. v. I. 8), and a gospel fragment from Maeseyck (Adcock 1974, I, 248). The free rings and the false terminations also indicate a degenerate form.
There is no evidence to support the popular attribution of the grave-cover to bishop Cedd. Collingwood's later dating, however, should not preclude the possibility of the slab being a later addition to Cedd's shrine – so long as we can be sure Cedd lies at Kirkdale.



