Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.
Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.
Object type: Part of grave-cover [1]
Measurements: L. 102 cm (40.25 in); W. 45.5 > 43 cm (18 > 17 in); D. 14 cm (5.5 in)
Stone type: [Lincolnshire Limestone but not Ancaster or Barnack types]
Plate numbers in printed volume: Fig. 14; Ills. 370–1
Corpus volume reference: Vol 5 p. 264
(There may be more views or larger images available for this item. Click on the thumbnail image to view.)
The middle section of a flat, rectangular or slightly tapering cover of Lindsey type decorated in low relief and only on the upper surface.
A (top): The border is defined by a single cable moulding and the central field is occupied by three interconnecting lines of simple pattern F interlace, which produce a repetitive figure-of-eight pattern in three surviving rows. The figure-of-eight units measure 18.5 × 10.75 cm (7.25 × 4.25 in): the spacing of the lines and rows are quite regular but the pattern is lop-sided because the rows are not accurately aligned across the cover. Despite its abraded surface, the decoration stands sharply as a squared U section against the flat cut-away background. Two longitudinal incisions or grooves run between the lines of interlace. These appear to be a later scoring of the stone, with the intention of splitting it for secondary use (cf. Lincoln (St Mark) 16 and Northorpe 1).
B (long): Undecorated but carefully worked into a bowed section.
C (end): Cut to form a section in the newel post of the staircase.
D (long): Cut for secondary use.
E (end): Built in.
F (bottom): Roughly dressed flat, perhaps original.
This is one of the interlace covers of Lindsey type discussed in Chapter V. It belongs to the sub-group (b) distinguished by its single cable border (Table 6). In its present form the stone is slightly tapering: this may reflect its original form but it is not possible to be certain. The pattern, too, appears surprisingly lop-sided, but its incomplete and damaged state does not allow any reason for this to be seen. With an original width of 46+ cm (18+ in) the cover must have been close to the norm of 50 cm found at Cammeringham 1, Lincoln St Mark 3 and Manby 1 among sub-group (b) and Laceby 1, Lincoln St Mark 4 and Miningsby 1 of sub-group (a). Its bowed edge section finds parallels at Blyborough 1 and Lincoln St Mark 4.