Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.
Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.
Object type: Transom of cross-head, and cross-shaft in two, non-adjacent, fragments [1]
Measurements:
a (cross-head):
H. 26 cm (10 in); W. 46 cm (18 in); D. 13 cm (5 in)
b (top of shaft):
H. 43 cm (17 in); W. 25 > 21 cm (10 > 8.5 in); D. 15 cm (6 in)
c (bottom of shaft):
H. 99 cm (39 in); W. 40 > 36 cm (15.75 > 14 in); D. 20 cm (8 in); [moulding 22 cm (8.5 in)]
Stone type:
a (top piece of cross-head): Yellowish grey (5Y 7/2), poorly sorted, clast-supported, fine- (0.2 mm) to granular (2.5 mm), but mostly medium- to coarse-grained between 0.3 and 0.7 mm, quartz sandstone. The clasts vary from sub-angular to sub-rounded. Millstone Grit, Carboniferous. (The bottom piece is modern.)
b (top of shaft): Yellowish grey (5Y 7/2), poorly sorted, clast-supported, medium- to coarse-grained (0.3 to 1.0 mm), but mostly between 0.4 and 0.8 mm, quartz sandstone; a few scattered sub-rounded pebbles up to 6.0 mm. The clasts vary from sub-angular to sub-rounded. Bedding parallel to front face. Millstone Grit, Carboniferous
c (bottom of shaft): Yellowish grey (5Y 7/2), poorly sorted, clast-supported, medium-grained (0.3 mm) to granular (3.0 mm), but mostly coarse-grained between 0.5 and 1.0 mm, quartz sandstone; a few scattered sub-rounded pebbles up to 6.0 mm. The clasts vary from sub-angular to sub-rounded. Bedding parallel to front face. Millstone Grit, Carboniferous
Plate numbers in printed volume: Ills. 409-12
Corpus volume reference: Vol 9 p. 164-6
(There may be more views or larger images available for this item. Click on the thumbnail image to view.)
The surviving cross-head transom suggests a head of type E10 with expanded terminals; the upper shaft fragment preserves the characteristic expansion of a shouldered type (D). The lower panels on all four faces are topped by a plinth-like moulding which encompasses the entire shaft.
A (broad): The decoration on the transom is surrounded by a bold arris moulding and consists of a central boss (with drilled hole) surrounded by a ring. In each surviving arm is a flat boss. The upper shaft fragment has a bold roll-moulding border both laterally and at the top; the expansion for the lower cross-arm survives. Decoration consists of a sub-triquetra form set over a (now very damaged) disk or boss. On the lower fragment are two panels, both with heavy moulding borders. The upper carries a triquetra, with extended and pointed upper element, set within an inverted V-shaped frame. The panel below is decorated with two linked Stafford knots (simple pattern E).
B (narrow): The end of the arm is decorated with battlement pattern (Bailey and Cramp 1988, fig. 6d), set within a roll-moulding frame, and the upper shaft fragment carries similar ornament, framed laterally by a bold roll-moulding border. The lower fragment carries two panels with heavy moulding borders; the upper decorated with alternating sunken squares and oblongs, the lower by a key pattern. The lower border on the bottom panel carries a single dogtooth or chevron moulding on its upper side.
C (broad): The head has a bold border moulding surrounding part of a cruciform decoration, which consists of flat bosses in the arms linked by a bar to a central ring surrounding a boss. A small fragment of the boss from the lower arm survives at the top of the upper shaft fragment. Below, framed laterally and above by a bold arris, is a meander pattern set over a further ornament whose only surviving element is an inverted V (? frame). The lower fragment is divided into two panels. The upper carries a pattern F knot linked to a pattern E terminal, whilst the lower panel consists of two crossed strands ending in small bosses and bound by a ring. The lower frame of this panel is elaborately dogtoothed on its upper side.
D (narrow): The end of the arm is surrounded by a moulding frame and decorated with a raised diamond shape, set on end with raised triangles above and below. This decoration of linked diamond shapes continues though the upper shaft fragment and into the upper panel of the lower fragment, though there is a horizontal moulding border at the bottom of the upper fragment. Below the plinth-like moulding which divides the two panels on this lower fragment is a simple two-strand twist. As on face B there is a single dogtooth or chevron moulding on the upper side of the lower border. All the lateral borders are formed by roll mouldings.
The links between this shaft and Whalley 3 have long been recognised (Ills. 675–8; Brown, G. 1937, pl. CIII, 1–2; Bailey 1980, 187); the re-assembly of a third shaft from Anderton/Hollowforth, perhaps originally from Preston, adds a third member to the group (Ills. 396–404), and other fragments from both Whalley (no. 2, Ills. 671–4) and Bolton le Moors itself (no. 7, p. 269) are clearly also related (see Chapter V, p. 37, and Table 4). With one or all of those carvings, Bolton le Moors 1 shares: bold border mouldings; a shouldered profile; a squared block base separated by a plinth-like moulding from the rest of the shaft; large bosses on the shaft; pointed arches; runs of diamond shapes; dogtooth moulding; key patterns; and a free-armed 'penannular' head (for the latter see Chapter V, p. 33). The metallic origin of many of these features is discussed under Whalley 3 (p. 247). Apart from the range of parallels between this shaft and Whalley 3, there is one further link to a Whalley carving: the simple open twist at the base recurs again on Whalley 7 (Ill. 688).
With Anderton it shares the use of closely similar key-pattern symbols to decorate the base panel of the shaft (Ill. 404). Since analogous forms of fret occur at Isel in Cumbria, on the Isle of Man and in Aberdeenshire, it is likely that this pattern carried a symbolic function (Bailey and Cramp 1988, ill. 374; Kermode 1907, no. 72; Ritchie, J. 1911, fig. 2).
The decoration on face C of the head is a version of the popular ""lorgnette"" motif first isolated by Collingwood (1913; 1927a, 94–8). This was already well established in Anglian sculpture on both slabs and crosses in the pre-Viking period (see Heysham 3, p. 200). In the subsequent tenth and eleventh centuries one form of the motif was heavily exploited in the Cumbrian 'spiral-scroll' school, whilst others can be found in Cumbria at Penrith and Kirkby Stephen — and across the Pennines at sites like Forcett, Gilling West, Gainford and Aberford (Bailey and Cramp 1988, fig. 7, ills. 410, 489; Lang 2001, ills. 250, 272, 274; Cramp 1984, pl. 67.327; Coatsworth 2008, ills. 5, 7). The relatively rare ornament of five bosses on the other face of the head is discussed under Cheadle 1 (p. 61); it may reflect Irish influence.
None of the decoration on the head is chronologically significant. Its penannular form, however, is a type which is popular in western Yorkshire and eastern Cheshire and Lancashire in the Viking period (see Chapter V, p. 33). Characteristic of the same period is the binding ring on face C (Bailey 1980, 71–2), whilst its combination with two crossing strands is clearly related to a similar motif on the Viking-age shaft, Disley Lyme Hall 1 (Ill. 131). The battlement pattern of face B belongs to the same chronological horizon.