Volume I: County Durham and Northumberland

Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.

Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.

Current Display: Escomb 07, Durham Forward button Back button
Overview
Present Location
Set up behind altar in chancel
Evidence for Discovery
Probably found in 1879 restoration. Longstaffe (1880) noticed one fragment at northern springing of eastern gable of nave, which he compared with Hexham work, while (----) 1885-6c clearly mentions two fragments with vine scroll. Johnson (1895-6) says all stones found among steps of crow-stepped gables from 200-year old roof, his information coming from local man who superintended 1879 repairs.
Church Dedication
St John the Evangelist
Present Condition
Broken at top but fairly unworn
Description

A (broad): The sides and the arched top are framed by a flat-band moulding. There is no moulding at the base, from which springs a cross set in a single block base. The sharply tapering shaft supports a cross-head of type B9. The head is surrounded by a fine roll moulding and in the centre of each arm is a small roundel. In the centre of the cross is a large boss, with an incised line on it which may be secondary. On either side of the shaft, just below the head, are bosses which seem to have been decorated.

B (narrow): Framed in a flat-band moulding are two long strands, loosely twisted.

C (broad): Not visible.

D (narrow): Three grooved strands, framed by a flat-band moulding.

Discussion

Although small grave-markers with relief crosses as the central motif are fairly common in this area in the late Saxon period (see Aycliffe 12), this is a deeper and more confident carving than the rest. The cross is a skeuomorph of a metal cross and the curious posies on either side of its head could be seen as hanging wreaths. The strange angular twists or lines on the narrow sides are also found on the edges of 4. These two pieces might therefore have formed part of the same scheme, such as the altar surround. The twists are not, however, as confident as on 4 or on the sundial (no. 8), so that it is possible that this slab is later than both.

Date
Late eighth to early ninth century
References
Browne 1883, 184; Brock 1888, 178, 409 and fig.; Hodges 1893-4, 236; Hodges 1894, 69; Hodges 1905, 229; Ball 1929-30b, 293, pl. 18, 2; Rivoira 1933, 187, fig. 608; Pevsner 1953, 142; Coatsworth 1979, I, 41-3, II, 20, pl. 6
Endnotes
1. The following are general references to the Escomb stones: Johnson 1895-6; (—) 1896-1905b, xxi.

Forward button Back button
mouseover