Volume 2: Cumberland, Westmorland and Lancashire-North-of-the-Sands

Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.

Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.

Current Display: Kirkby Stephen 02, Westmorland Forward button Back button
Overview
Present Location
West end of nave, inside
Evidence for Discovery
Upper fragment discovered during rebuilding of chancel in 1847 (Hodgson 1869-79, 186). Lower fragment first recorded in 1936 (R.C.H.M. 1936, 142)
Church Dedication
St John
Present Condition
Broken and slightly worn
Description

A? (broad): Five petals of a deeply cut rosette attached to a stem which curls to the left with a rounded internal leaf. The main stem enclosing the rosette springs from a cup-like node which is lightly ridged. A stiff, rounded bud and another strand spring from the node. This strand curls back to enclose two pellets or berries, below a pendent leaf with large detached lobes or flanking berries.

B? (narrow): Tooled with rough diagonal tooling.

C? (broad): Split away.

D? (narrow): Broken away.

Discussion

This was once part of a large-scale scroll, on what was probably one of the broad faces of the cross. The plant form has some features in common with Lowther 1 and 2, such as the rosettes in the scroll, loose berries or pellets and the leaf type, but it is carved in a deep, bold style which is quite different from the western scrolls and can be paralleled east of the Pennines. Rosettes in scrolls can be found at Hoddom, Dumfriesshire (Radford 1954, pl. IIIb) and also at Wycliffe, Yorkshire, where the scroll is cut in the same bold manner as here (Collingwood 1907a, 412, fig. d). However, rosette motifs are a common feature on sculpture from Hexham, Northumberland (Cramp 1984, 172, 910; 178, 944; 179, 955; 182, 972;), as well as occurring on Carlisle 1 (see above, p. 85). It is unfortunate that, as at Brigham 1, only a fragment of this distinctive scroll survives to indicate the presence of what must have been an imposing and large-scale monument.

Date
Second half of eighth century
References
Hodgson 1869–79, 186, pl. I; Hodgson 1883, 9–10, pl. I; Allen 1885, 355; R.C.H.M. 1936, lxvi, 143; Bailey 1972, 15; Bailey 1974a, I, 20, 23, 34, II, 175, (no. III) 180, (no. VI), pls.; Cramp 1984, 77
Endnotes

Forward button Back button
mouseover