Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.
Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.
Object type: Part of shaft
Measurements: (after (—) 1880b) L. 152 cm (60 in) W. 55 cm (22 in) D. 30 cm (12 in)
Stone type: Not recorded
Plate numbers in printed volume:
Corpus volume reference: Vol 6 p. 297
(There may be more views or larger images available for this item. Click on the thumbnail image to view.)
(The description relies on the newspaper reports of 28 February 1880.) 'A huge block of stone, which had apparently been either a tomb-stone or a cross' ((—) 1880c).
A (broad) : The side next to the body was carved with ornament variously described as 'irregular diamond and lacework pattern' ((—) 1880b); 'an irregular lacework suggestion [sic] of the Saxon period' ((—) 1880c); and 'irregular diamonds or interlaced work' ((—) 1880d; (—) 1880e).
B (narrow) : 'On scratching out the earth from underneath the end near the foot of the skeleton, what seemed like a sculptured human face could be traced with the fingers' ((—) 1880b). 'At one end of the underneath part which is embedded in the earth could be felt with the fingers what seemed to be the outlines of a human face' ((—) 1880c).
C (broad) and D (narrow) : Not recorded.
Appendix C item (lost stones for which no illustration has survived).
Dr Richard Hall discovered the original newspaper cutting ((—) 1880b) and generously provided a copy. The reuse of the shaft in a late medieval grave is carefully described in the report. The 'lacework' is probably interlace and human portraiture was common throughout the pre-Conquest period. There is no clue as to date.



