Volume I: County Durham and Northumberland

Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.

Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.

Current Display: Hexham 13, Northumberland Forward button Back button
Overview
Present Location
Niche in north wall of modern nave of abbey
Evidence for Discovery
Found January 1911 in digging foundations of building in Beaumont Street, Hexham, now Conservative Club
Church Dedication
St Andrew
Present Condition
Unworn and apparently complete
Description

The stone is roughly shaped with a rounded top and slightly curved verticals.

A (broad): In the centre is a cross, type E8. The cross has been set out in an incised circle and is at an angle from the top of the stone (the central setting-out hole is still visible). The ground has been chiselled away to form the splayed arms. There is an inscription in seriffed Anglo-Saxon capitals, two letters of which appear on each arm of the cross:

 TV II ND II VI II NI

This is presumably an Old English masculine personal name.

B, D and E (narrow sides and top): Roughly dressed.

C (broad): Plain.

Discussion

Tund- is not known as a name element, but according to Okasha (1971, 80) the name may be a form of the recorded Tondwine. Okasha gives the date of this piece as `eighth to ninth century' and certainly it does appear as though these small round-headed grave-markers, in which the cross is shown in low relief, are a later development than the simple incised group of Lindisfarne or Hartlepool (Introduction, p. 7). In the form of the cross this piece is nearest to Bothal 5 which includes later ornament. It is also similar to those on slabs from Ardwall Isle, nos. 4 and 13 (Thomas 1967, 152-3, 164-5), which have been dated eighth to tenth century. The unique placing of the inscription round the ends of the arms of the cross may be because the inscription is secondary, or merely an attempt to place it on the most prominent surface. If the piece were intended to lie flat, the inscription would have been perfectly readable.

Date
Late eighth to late ninth century
References
Gibson 1911-12; Hodges and Gibson 1919, 68; Hodges 1921, 34-5, fig. on 35; Collingwood 1927, 12, fig. 17A; Dahl 1938, 10, 188; Taylor and Taylor 1961, 123; Taylor and Taylor 1965, 305; Okasha 1971, 80, pi. 52; Cramp 1974, 174, pl. 15D; Coatsworth 1981, 26
Endnotes
1. The following are general references to the Hexham stones: (—) 1855-7a, 45-6; Rowe 1877, 62-3; Allen 1889, 230; Bailey 1980, 79, 81, 83.

Forward button Back button
mouseover