Volume 4: South-East England

Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.

Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.

Current Display: Wherwell 01, Hampshire Forward button Back button
Overview
Present Location
On the bench at the west end of the north aisle
Evidence for Discovery
None; probably found during rebuilding of church between 1856 and 1858
Church Dedication
St Peter and Holy Cross
Present Condition
Worn; damaged by reuse
Description

The stone was reshaped as a corbel in the thirteenth century. The shaft is of rectangular section and tapers towards the upper end which has been re-cut to form a conical corbel whose face is on the same plane as face A. The shoulders between the corbel and the shaft are irregularly stepped.

A (broad): On the face of the corbel is a heavily damaged encircled interlace of pattern C, the ends of the diagonals having been cut away by the shaping of the corbel. The rest of the face is undecorated.

B (narrow): Face B is decorated with a single rectangular panel, incomplete above and damaged to the right, which is decorated with interlace, a unit of complete pattern A.

C (broad): Irregularly cut back.

D (narrow): There is a single rectangular panel in the corresponding position to that on face B. This has a plain relief border above, but is damaged to the left, and is filled with an encircled pattern C interlace or ring-knot, with median-incised strands.

Discussion
Despite the later reshaping of this piece to form a thirteenth-century corbel, there is no doubt that it was originally a cross-shaft of square section. Like the shafts from Bishops Waltham, Hampshire (no.1), Barking, Essex (no. 1), and probably Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, this shaft may have been predominantly interlace decorated. This gives few clues as to date, but the use of rather a thick strand, in one case median- incised, suggests a later rather than earlier date.
Date
Tenth to eleventh century
References
Page 1911, 414; Atkinson 1938 - 40, 369 - 70; Cox and Jowitt 1949, 181; Green and Green 1951, 45 - 6, pl. XV; Pevsner and Lloyd 1967, 650; Tweddle 1986b, i, 95, 244, 246 - 7, ii, 507 - 8, iii, pls. 114 - 15
D.T.
Endnotes

Forward button Back button
mouseover