Volume 4: South-East England

Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.

Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.

Current Display: Canterbury (St Augustine's Abbey) 09, Kent Forward button Back button
Overview
Present Location
Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission Stores, Dover castle
Evidence for Discovery
First recorded in Peers 1927a
Church Dedication
St Augustine's abbey
Present Condition
Broken and heavily weathered
Description

It is sub-rectangular, with a broad, plain, low relief border to the left and right, and a similar, narrower border at the upper end. The lower end is roughly broken. Only one face is carved.

A: This face is slightly convex and is decorated with a neatly laid out but worn interlace, surrounded pattern D.

B and C: The two surviving edges of the stone are smoothly dressed.

Discussion

This may be one of the 'smaller fragments' of sculpture discovered during Hope's excavations built into the base of the Romanesque screen overlying the western part of Wulfric's rotunda. There is no direct mention of it in his account of his work, however. See also Canterbury, K. (St Augustine's abbey) no. 3, above.

The simplest way to reconstruct this piece is as one end of a rectangular slab. The damage to the sides makes it difficult to decide whether the long edges were originally parallel, or whether the stone tapered.

The stone could originally have served any one of a number of functions, for example, as a decorative architectural panel or closure slab, but the convexity of face A is more reminiscent of the treatment of grave-covers. A number of relatively narrow covers are known from south-east England, for example, several of those from Chithurst, Sussex. The depth of the St Augustine's slab is also typical of grave-covers from the region, which tend to be around 10 cm deep.

The dating of the stone is based on the type of interlace pattern employed, and the thickness of the strand; these features are of a type normally associated with late Anglo-Saxon sculpture.

Date
Tenth to eleventh century
References
Peers 1927a, pl. XXVIII; Cottrill 1931, appendix; Tweddle 1986b, i, 90, 252 - 3, ii, 364, iii, pl. 30a
D.T.
Endnotes

Forward button Back button
mouseover