Volume 6: Northern Yorkshire

Select a site alphabetically from the choices shown in the box below. Alternatively, browse sculptural examples using the Forward/Back buttons.

Chapters for this volume, along with copies of original in-text images, are available here.

Current Display: Whitby 23 (abbey), Yorkshire North Riding Forward button Back button
Overview
Present Location
British Museum, London, in store (Whitby loans register no. W 5)
Evidence for Discovery
See Whitby 1 (abbey, St Peter and St Hilda). Probably the 'portion of Saxon cross, long inscription', found 9 December 1924, in section 2, low level (Whitby finds register, no. 689)
Church Dedication
St Peter and St Hilda
Present Condition
All limbs missing; rather worn
Description

A (broad) : Four semicircular arm-pits survive but no limbs. On the left are remains of a narrow edge moulding. A worn inscription fills the face of the cross-head.

R.C.

Inscription Traces of four lines of incised lettering run across the full remaining breadth of the cross-head. It is uncertain how far the lines extended onto the lost sections of the horizontal arms. The blank area above the top line shows that this was always the first line and there are no certain indications of lettering below the fourth line. Letters were generally about 3 cm high, although the vertical of the last remaining letter in line 1 projects above and below the line and reaches about 4.5 cm. The inscription is so badly abraded that few letters are now recognizable and language and meaning are uncertain.

— [ABI . . R . . EOÞ] —

— [ — AA] —

— [ — F .] —

The inscription seems to have been in capitals and to have included some uncial forms. The first distinct form in line 1 may perhaps have been intended as a version of uncial A in which the diagonal stroke has been set vertically. If so, it can be paralleled in the display script of the Lindisfarne Gospels, although there the loop is angular rather than rounded (e.g. the last letter on fol. 95r: Alexander 1978, ill. 46). The next letter might have been B or uncial H. The third line from the right in line 1 seems to have been a rounded, or uncial, E and the last remaining letter could have been an uncial H, although it was more probably a thorn and therefore probably part of an Old English name. The penultimate letter in line 2 may have been capital A with an angled cross-bar.

J.H.

B (narrow) : The arm-pits are roughly dressed but worn; plain.

C (broad) : Smoothly dressed, and plain.

D (narrow) : As face B.

Discussion

One of the plain crosses without edge mouldings which seem to belong to a later development of the Plain Cross series (see Chapter VI).

R.C.

Inscription Whitby 23 seems to have been a plain stone cross designed to display an inscription on its head and, as such, can be compared to Whitby 20, 21 and 22, and perhaps also 24 and 26.[2] The inscription on this cross was comparatively long and was set out in four packed lines of lettering. The contents and purpose of the inscription are unknown but, if it contained an Old English name as suggested by the possible thorn, that would suggest that it was a memorial to a named individual. Radford's reading of the first line as a part of a Latin memorial formula cannot be justified on the basis of what survives on the stone (Peers and Radford 1943, 46).

The lettering seems to have consisted of capitals of mixed forms and could perhaps be classed with the 'Insular decorative capitals' found in the display script of many Insular manuscripts and some Insular inscriptions (Higgitt 1994). The lettering of Whitby 23, as far as it can now be judged, seems to have been somewhat different in character from the plain capital and uncial forms of Whitby 20 and 21 and may represent a different, perhaps somewhat later phase, in which a greater variety of forms was admitted into display script and inscriptions at Whitby, although these letters seem to have lacked the angularity of treatment that can be glimpsed in Whitby 22 and 34.

J.H.

Date
Eighth or ninth century
References
Peers and Radford 1943, 37, 46, no. 13, pl. XXIII; Okasha 1971, 122, no. 126, pl.; Higgitt 1986b, 130, 148; Higgitt 1995, 232, 234, fig. 9
Endnotes
[1] The following are general references to the Whitby stones: Hood 1927, 38, 45, 49; Kendall 1932, 9–10, 26–7, 28; Peers and Radford 1943, 33–40; Clapham 1952, 11; Wilson, D. 1964, 9; Cramp 1965b, 4; Fellows-Jensen 1972, 218; Cramp 1976a, 228; Cramp 1976b, 455–7; Rahtz 1976, 460; Cramp 1978a, 7; Bailey 1980, 81, 82; Okasha 1983, 118; Cramp 1984, 9, 79, 109, 180, 222; Higgitt 1986b, 130–1, 134, 148; Bailey and Cramp 1988, 55, 56, 85, 154; Cramp 1989, 223; Lang 1989a, 67; Lang 1990a, 2–3; Higgitt 1991, 45; Lang 1991, 24, 109, 138, 139; Cramp 1992, 8, 24, 107, 224, 252; Okasha 1992, 84; Cramp 1993, 68–9, 71; Fellows-Jensen 1995, 177; Higgitt 1995, 229–36; Rahtz 1995, 7–8; Bailey 1996a, 50–1, 111; Hawkes 1999b, 403, 410–16; Karkov 1999, 133–4; Stocker 2000, 200; Stopford 2000, 102, 104.

Forward button Back button
mouseover